Hurricane City Hurricane TV CaneTalk Logo
CaneTalk Forum | Search Messages | Post a New Message | Member Map

| HurricaneCity | Tropical Atlantic | Chat Room | Board Rules




Review of last recon mission into Nate

Posted by Chris in Tampa on 10/14/2017, 11:25 pm

Last Nate mission:
http://hurricanecity.com/recon/recon.cgi?basin=al&year=2017&product=hdob&storm=Nate&mission=09&agency=AF&ob=10-08-044600-64-993.1-79-59

Before the strongest winds made it onshore, I think the surface winds may have come down a little further. (flight were too, though not as much) There wasn't a large area of strongest winds so it was easy for the strongest winds not to be measured on land. But the SFMR values were coming down before landfall too. There is one caveat though. When the storm turned NNE, the highest winds may have been more south than the due east where recon was flying before landfall. So they might not have hit the strongest winds.

Looking at some of the SFMR values, some of them may have been in too shallow of water. The highest values were often just east of some of the barrier islands. Given where the storm was, the highest wind could be expected to be just east of it.

I picked out what I see to be the highest 10 second estimated surface winds estimated from the SFMR instrument on the aircraft from each pass before landfall.




I was looking at some of the historical imagery in Google Earth. Some of the images make the water look even shallower than default imagery.

2012 imagery:



2013 imagery:



I'll have to keep that in mind in the future. I thought the first 92mph suspect reading was over a little bit deeper water.

Default imagery:



Here is the highest flight level winds before landfall by the way:



The highest 30 second flight level winds of the entire mission were 86 kts (99.0 mph). Here was the entire mission:



So you can see flight level winds didn't come down much.

As for surface winds, going back to first image, flying toward the east, due east, from the center, here were some of the highest readings in a row, every 30 seconds:

44 kts (50.6 mph)
53 kts (61.0 mph)
57 kts* (65.6 mph*)
64 kts (73.6 mph)
72 kts (82.9 mph)
75 kts (86.3 mph)
74 kts* (85.2 mph*)
75 kts (86.3 mph)
77 kts* (88.6 mph*)
63 kts (72.5 mph)
60 kts (69.0 mph)

This was in the pass that has the southernmost 984mb vortex icon. I would consider these to reliable as there were many in a row. So I would say the intensity was about 85mph then.

As for at landfall on mainland, not counting any barrier islands, depends on if the winds would have been higher just a little south of due east. If they were not, I would say 70mph based on recon. But assuming they could be a little higher in places at the time, or just south of due east where they did not fly, perhaps 75mph.

I'm treating the SFMR as if it were 1 minute sustained, which the NHC sometimes does when setting the advisory intensity, assuming there are higher winds likely and also because that's all they have. I like to see two readings in a row about the same.

As for sonde data, which has momentary winds, including at the surface: They seemed to indicate around to slightly less than the SFMR values. They did seem to indicate higher winds not too far above the surface, of about 10mph or more. You can see sondes here:
http://hurricanecity.com/recon/recon.cgi?basin=al&year=2017&storm=Nate&mission=09&agency=AF&product=sonde

There wasn't too many and they could have easily missed the highest winds.

49



In this thread:

Is Nate a one or two??? - Mark in PC Beach, 10/7/2017, 9:15 pm

< Return to message board



Post A Reply

Subject:


Message:

Add Smiley:

Add Image (Tutorial):
Image URL:
Add  


Embed Video or other Social Media:
Page URL of YouTube Video: Add
Page URL of Facebook post or image (not image URL): Add
Page URL of Twitter tweet: Add
Page URL of recorded Ustream Video: Add
Page URL of Vine Video: Add
If you prefer to embed something manually for any of these sites, you can also do that. For Ustream, you can only embed live videos manually rather than using the above feature. No other sites are currently supported.

If you embed something manually please be aware that due to the security restrictions on some browsers manually entering embedded code may not allow it to appear correctly when you view it. However, after you post the message it will work properly. This will not be a problem if you use the above feature to add embedded content.