Re: Analogs
Posted by
BobbiStorm on 8/22/2010, 9:22 am
yeah would that be a hoot... no disrespect to jax..
just saying...
1.... it's a very neat wave, i don't see it falling apart... neat = tighter circ not broad mass of vortexes
2.. if danielle develops as expected it keeps it in check until its further west
3.. daniells outflow keeps it west
sort of a west west situation no matter how you look at it
also think danielle is not as perfect internally as the models are reading her to be and she needs to wrap convection from the lead wave into the center of the td or she will not ramp up as fast and strong as expected and will give earl (love that name) more breathing room |
46
In this thread:
Bright Future for TD6 -
JAC,
8/21/2010, 9:44 pm- 168Hrs: OK, where does it go after this? - JAC, 8/22/2010, 7:55 am
- Re: 168Hrs: OK, where does it go after this? - tracker, 8/22/2010, 9:06 am
- Analogs - JAC, 8/22/2010, 9:13 am
- Re: Analogs - BobbiStorm, 8/22/2010, 9:22 am
- Re: 168Hrs: OK, where does it go after this? - BobbiStorm, 8/22/2010, 9:03 am
- Almost TS Danielle - JAC, 8/22/2010, 7:10 am
- NCEP Ensembles - JAC, 8/21/2010, 11:16 pm
- PREDICT May Fly in Monday - JAC, 8/21/2010, 10:38 pm
- Fireworks should start close to the 50-yard line - JAC, 8/21/2010, 10:27 pm
- So, what's the problem? - JAC, 8/21/2010, 10:23 pm
- Re: Bright Future for TD6 - BobbiStorm, 8/21/2010, 9:52 pm
- Think Pouch - JAC, 8/21/2010, 9:52 pm
Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.