CaneTalk: Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ...

Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ...

Posted by LawKat on 8/31/2010, 4:52 pm

I think you're right. His optimal conditions ran out quicker than the NHC thought.

Shear and dry air will likely not allow another peak as deep as 931.

In this thread:

From a purely intensity standpoint ... - LawKat, 8/30/2010, 6:32 pm

Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - canetrakker, 8/31/2010, 3:13 pm
- Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - LawKat, 8/31/2010, 4:52 pm
  - Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - canetrakker, 8/31/2010, 5:30 pm
Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - Gianmarc, 8/30/2010, 7:34 pm
Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - BobbiStorm, 8/30/2010, 7:30 pm
Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - Anung Mwka, 8/30/2010, 6:52 pm
Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - canetrakker, 8/30/2010, 6:40 pm
- his history at 5 PM - CypressTX, 8/30/2010, 6:57 pm
  - Re: his history at 5 PM - BobbiStorm, 8/30/2010, 7:30 pm
  - Re: his history at 5 PM - Chris in Tampa, 8/30/2010, 7:13 pm
    - Re: his history at 5 PM - CypressTX, 8/30/2010, 7:26 pm
  - Re: his history at 5 PM - HURRICANEHIRAM, 8/30/2010, 7:01 pm

< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in

Post A Reply

This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.