Re: 2005 vs. 2010 (to date)
Posted by Chris in Tampa on 7/10/2010, 2:07 pm
Speaking of post season upgrades, I think Invest 95L (that made landfall in LA and drove the NHC to go from 0% to 60% to 0% in a span of six hours) will likely be upgraded to a depression. I think it has a chance at being upgraded to an unnamed tropical storm. Although the NHC has readjusted the best track file and taken out the one position where they had previously adjusted its level of development to tropical depression and also readjusted the wind from 35 knots at the highest to 30 knots, so it is less likely perhaps to be upgraded to an unnamed tropical storm post season.

Invest 92L (the long tracker that was in the mid Atlantic) I think was also a depression but I'm not sure the NHC would bother upgrading it since it was way out there bothering nobody, didn't last long, and has less obs.

I think this season has been a little bit busier than the headlines suggest. I think we're still likely in for a season with the number of named storms in the high teens.
121
In this thread:
2005 vs. 2010 (to date) - LawKat, 7/10/2010, 11:34 am
< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in
Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.