Re: 2005 vs. 2010 (to date)
Posted by
jack ruby on 7/11/2010, 9:20 am
| Yes I agree Chris with you Chris that the statistics for this season are a little deceiving, it has been more active than one might think. You referred to 92L which made landfall along the central La coast last week (strongly favor an upgrade to depression at year's end). Chris, you're very resourceful---I think if some could look at a time-lapse regional radar loop of that system's landfall and movement across La.---they might also agree that an upgrade was in order. All in all, I would consider this period from mid-June through early July 2010 to be very active in comparison to a "normal" early season. Think we're in something of a lull now---which reflects the transition from early "proto-season" to mid season---which I believe will begin 10 days to 2 weeks earlier than usual. |
45
In this thread:
2005 vs. 2010 (to date) -
LawKat,
7/10/2010, 11:34 am Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.