Re: Was there a warning posted or was it assumed the 7.2 on 3/9 was the biggie?
Posted by BobbiStorm on 3/11/2011, 11:50 am
I am and thanks for the threads.

I'm just annoyed that there was no "official" sort of warning as it seems obvious that the amount of large shakes that close together were leading somewhere and growing.
47
In this thread:
Was there a warning posted or was it assumed the 7.2 on 3/9 was the biggie? - BobbiStorm, 3/11/2011, 10:54 am
< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in
Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.