Re: apparently we have 92L
Posted by Shalista on 8/8/2011, 9:05 am
But I'm keeping my eye on this tho,  

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/carb/flash-vis.html

My reasoning for this is that the shear factor in this area is low for this to develop..

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/windmain.php?&basin=atlantic&sat=wg8&prod=shr&zoom=&time=

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/windmain.php?&basin=atlantic&sat=wg8&prod=sht&zoom=&time=

Whereas invest 92L will have to deal with high Shear and dry air conditions which are behind that which I am watching.

The big picture.....

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/natl/flash-wv.html

invest 92L is in the lower right..

what is everyone elses thoughts?
172
In this thread:
apparently we have 92L - Shalista, 8/8/2011, 8:55 am
< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in
Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.