Home | Post New Message | Member Map | Chat | Register | Login

MIMIC-TPW

Posted by JAC on 6/26/2009, 7:52 pm

42

In this thread:

Models on a possible GOM System next week - JAC, 6/26/2009, 8:02 am

• Anti-cyclone reformed to the SE, Circulation at top of Boundary Layer - JAC, 6/27/2009, 1:52 am
• GFDL & HWRF - JAC, 6/26/2009, 8:04 pm
  • Expect a deeper TC if this tracks further north toward the Panhandle - JAC, 6/26/2009, 8:15 pm
    • HWRF (120mph) - Target, 6/26/2009, 10:13 pm
      • Re: HWRF (120mph) - Anung Mwka, 6/27/2009, 10:13 am
      • Yikes! - JAC, 6/27/2009, 1:29 am
      • Re: HWRF - Chris_in_Tampa, 6/26/2009, 10:45 pm
        • Here's intensity guidance - JAC, 6/27/2009, 1:38 am
          • Quite the model spread - skip_wiley, 6/27/2009, 10:10 am
        • Re: HWRF - Target, 6/26/2009, 11:06 pm
• UL Winds pushing convection SE of LLC - JAC, 6/26/2009, 6:02 pm
  • MIMIC-TPW - JAC, 6/26/2009, 7:52 pm
    • LI's down to -12 over the Yucatan - JAC, 6/26/2009, 9:54 pm
• Re: Models on a possible GOM System next week - Hurricane Ranger, 6/26/2009, 5:03 pm
• Re: Models on a possible GOM System next week - rbc, 6/26/2009, 4:34 pm
• LLC Analysis just in - looks good - closed off - JAC, 6/26/2009, 3:15 pm
  • Huge jump in SOI, EPAC system winding down - Mike_Doran, 6/26/2009, 3:48 pm
    • Re: Huge jump in SOI, EPAC system winding down - CX, 6/26/2009, 3:53 pm
      • Re: Huge jump in SOI, EPAC system winding down - JAC, 6/26/2009, 4:09 pm
• Re: Models on a possible GOM System next week - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 2:53 pm
  • Re: Models on a possible GOM System next week - JAC, 6/26/2009, 2:59 pm
• Kicked up a notch - ORANGE BOX - JAC, 6/26/2009, 1:56 pm
  • Cirrus canopy at 55K-ft - JAC, 6/26/2009, 2:01 pm
    • Re: Cirrus canopy at 55K-ft - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 2:08 pm
      • Re: Cirrus canopy at 55K-ft - JAC, 6/26/2009, 2:16 pm
        • Watch for a white bulls-eye on Funktop - JAC, 6/26/2009, 2:27 pm
          • dvorak - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 2:50 pm
            • Re: dvorak LINK sorry - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 2:50 pm
• Early Guidance is cutting it close - JAC, 6/26/2009, 12:37 pm
  • 12Z GFS takes it through the channel - JAC, 6/26/2009, 1:14 pm
    • am i right on the gfs? - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 2:12 pm
      • Re: am i right on the gfs? - JAC, 6/26/2009, 2:18 pm
  • Seeing vorticity at 500mb for the ULL and 93L - JAC, 6/26/2009, 12:51 pm
• Loop-current warmer than usual for this time of year - JAC, 6/26/2009, 10:44 am
• ULL to the NW at 20N 89W - JAC, 6/26/2009, 10:00 am
  • Re: ULL to the NW at 20N 89W - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 10:42 am
  • Re: ULL to the NW at 20N 89W - sandy, 6/26/2009, 10:42 am
  • Re: ULL to the NW at 20N 89W - sandy, 6/26/2009, 10:35 am
  • QSCAT - JAC, 6/26/2009, 10:27 am
• 93L - JAC, 6/26/2009, 8:38 am
  • Winds shifting around - JAC, 6/26/2009, 1:06 pm
  • Well stacked - JAC, 6/26/2009, 12:58 pm
  • Great Warm-Core Inversion with Anti-Cyclone Overhead - JAC, 6/26/2009, 11:07 am
    • Re: Great Warm-Core Inversion with Anti-Cyclone Overhead - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 11:43 am
      • Re: Great Warm-Core Inversion with Anti-Cyclone Overhead - JAC, 6/26/2009, 12:15 pm
        • from my 'nerdy NASA" emails - 93L - CypressTX, 6/26/2009, 2:53 pm
        • Here's the Refs - JAC, 6/26/2009, 12:32 pm
  • SCATs - JAC, 6/26/2009, 9:02 am
    • NADA on QSCAT - JAC, 6/26/2009, 9:37 am
  • Yucatan Buoy Watch - JAC, 6/26/2009, 8:48 am
  • Cu-tops at 55K-ft - JAC, 6/26/2009, 8:44 am
    • Re: Cu-tops at 55K-ft - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 10:50 am
      • Re: Cu-tops at 55K-ft - JAC, 6/26/2009, 10:56 am
    • Very heavy rain-rate - JAC, 6/26/2009, 9:40 am
    • Big overshooting Cu-Nimb on VIS - JAC, 6/26/2009, 9:18 am
• Forecast Air Conditions - JAC, 6/26/2009, 8:32 am
  • TUTT north of Hispaniola on Thursday - JAC, 6/26/2009, 9:27 am
• Don't even think about a landfall target yet - JAC, 6/26/2009, 8:10 am
  • Re: Don't even think about a landfall target yet - BobbiStorm, 6/26/2009, 10:54 am

< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in

Post A Reply

This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.