Re: They posted a new version
Posted by Chris in Tampa on 8/20/2015, 12:58 am
People can read it. I was going to point out things wrong, but there are still so many things wrong. It's a little better in some ways now. Before it looked like a rough draft. There is more now for people to make their own conclusions about it.

This is still patently ridiculous:

"Customers will be alerted to weather conditions in their specific locations, and Carlson promises NSC data will be better than the National Weather Service, which focuses on regions as opposed to specific locations."

You can try, but making promises like that makes me write them off completely. You can try. If the guy is rich, go for it, try to develop better technology. But prove it works and stop making outlandish claims beforehand, it just makes you look ridiculous.

But at least the article has more uncertainty in it, like they claim a certain thing, rather than stating this is a fact, which is more how it kind of read before.

At least it reads more like this is a private business ("consumer advocacy organization") trying to compete rather than what it was before, presented more as if it was an official organization.

I still have no idea if most of what they say is true.
83
In this thread:
National Storm Center??? - Beachlover, 8/19/2015, 5:51 pm
< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in
Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.