CaneTalk: Super Typhoon Choi-Wan (ADT at Cat5)

Super Typhoon Choi-Wan (ADT at Cat5)

Posted by JAC on 9/15/2009, 7:38 am

Best Track currently at 130 knots.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/products/tc_realtime/4kmsrbdc_loop.asp?storm_identifier=WP152009&starting_image=2009WP15_4KMSRBDC_200909120057.jpg

ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 7.2.3
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 15 SEP 2009 Time : 103000 UTC
Lat : 17:45:22 N Lon : 145:09:35 E

CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
6.9 / 903.2mb/137.4kt

Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
(3hr avg)
6.9 7.0 7.0

Latitude bias adjustment to MSLP : +2.0mb

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 18 km

Center Temp : +17.2C Cloud Region Temp : -74.8C

Scene Type : EYE

Positioning Method : RING/SPIRAL COMBINATION

220

In this thread:

Super Typhoon Choi-Wan (ADT at Cat5) - JAC, 9/15/2009, 7:38 am

Re: Super Typhoon Choi-Wan (ADT at Cat5) - Fred, 9/16/2009, 1:07 pm
Eye Diameter = 40 miles - JAC, 9/16/2009, 9:58 am
AMSU shows 8C Core - JAC, 9/16/2009, 9:44 am
- Pressure taking a nose-dive - JAC, 9/16/2009, 9:45 am
  - Hooooly Scheisse. - CX, 9/16/2009, 12:54 pm
    - Re: Hooooly Scheisse. - JAC, 9/16/2009, 1:51 pm
Re: Super Typhoon Choi-Wan (ADT at Cat5) - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:12 am
- Re: Super Typhoon Choi-Wan (ADT at Cat5) - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:14 am
  - Re: Super Typhoon Choi-Wan (ADT at Cat5) - Fred, 9/16/2009, 7:48 am
    - Re: Super Typhoon Choi-Wan (ADT at Cat5) - JAC, 9/16/2009, 8:02 am
Still Cat5 and no sign of letting up - JAC, 9/16/2009, 6:56 am
- Re: Still Cat5 and no sign of letting up - gi_metro13w, 9/16/2009, 10:35 am
  - Re: Still Cat5 and no sign of letting up - JAC, 9/16/2009, 10:43 am
- Re: Still Cat5 and no sign of letting up - CX, 9/16/2009, 7:12 am
  - Re: Still Cat5 and no sign of letting up - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:16 am
    - Re: Still Cat5 and no sign of letting up - CX, 9/16/2009, 12:51 pm
- Core Perfection - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:04 am
- Hot Towers shooting in the outer Rain Bands - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:03 am
Tokyo in the Cone - JAC, 9/16/2009, 6:46 am
- Uh-oh! - JAC, 9/16/2009, 10:32 am
  - Re: Uh-oh! - chucky7777, 9/16/2009, 11:24 am
    - Re: Uh-oh! - JAC, 9/16/2009, 11:37 am
- GFS - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:36 am
  - 06Z Run - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:44 am
- JMA Discussion - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:10 am
Re: Super Typhoon Choi-Wan what a monster!!!!! - chucky7777, 9/16/2009, 3:59 am
CloudSAT shows Hot-Towers on both sides of Eyewall - JAC, 9/15/2009, 11:03 pm
- Hot Towers make Hot Cores - JAC, 9/16/2009, 6:37 am
Iwo To (Iwo Jima) Under the Gun - JAC, 9/15/2009, 4:16 pm
- Iwo Jima OBS - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:19 am
  - Re: Iwo Jima OBS - JAC, 9/16/2009, 7:22 am
Best Track at 140-knots (Solid Cat5) - JAC, 9/15/2009, 4:07 pm
- Re: Best Track at 140-knots (Solid Cat5) - JAC, 9/15/2009, 4:11 pm
Another EWRC starting - JAC, 9/15/2009, 2:09 pm
- MSLP coming up - JAC, 9/15/2009, 2:51 pm
- 37GHZ --> still intensifying - JAC, 9/15/2009, 2:09 pm
Gale-Force Wind Field = 325 nm radius - JAC, 9/15/2009, 1:13 pm
Possible direct hit on Agrihan and Alamagan islands - JAC, 9/15/2009, 1:05 pm
Ironic But... - CX, 9/15/2009, 11:44 am
Modis - Doorman, 9/15/2009, 10:52 am
- Re: Modis - JAC, 9/15/2009, 10:57 am
885 mb - JAC, 9/15/2009, 9:35 am
- Re: 885 mb - CX, 9/15/2009, 10:39 am
  - Re: 885 mb - JAC, 9/15/2009, 10:44 am
    - Re: 885 mb - CX, 9/15/2009, 10:49 am
      - Re: 885 mb - JAC, 9/15/2009, 10:56 am
        Re: 885 mb - CX, 9/15/2009, 11:00 am
        Re: 885 mb - JAC, 9/15/2009, 11:15 am
        Re: 885 mb - CX, 9/15/2009, 11:18 am
- Will it beat Tip? - JAC, 9/15/2009, 9:44 am
  - References - JAC, 9/15/2009, 9:54 am
TYPHOON WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT FOR AGRIHAN - JAC, 9/15/2009, 8:36 am
JTWC Forecasting 140 Knts - TUTT reinforcing poleward outflow channel - JAC, 9/15/2009, 8:15 am
- Guidance - JAC, 9/15/2009, 8:39 am
  - 48 Hrs at Cat 5 - JAC, 9/15/2009, 8:41 am
Eating about one-third of the energy in the WPAC - JAC, 9/15/2009, 7:53 am
Just finishing an EWRC - JAC, 9/15/2009, 7:43 am

< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in

Post A Reply

This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.