Re: concern over containment vessel being broken
Posted by
Chris in Tampa on 3/14/2011, 10:26 pm
The person who is still talking just said the spent fuel (number 4) is not going to catch fire in the general sense. It's in the building area (the fire) and it would be best to extinguish the fire.
I guess that doesn't mean it can't catch fire, but he is saying the fuel itself is not on fire. |
41
In this thread:
concern over containment vessel being broken -
BobbiStorm,
3/14/2011, 8:03 pm- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - ArgosyTn, 3/14/2011, 11:02 pm
- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - Chris in Tampa, 3/14/2011, 10:22 pm
- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - Chris in Tampa, 3/14/2011, 10:26 pm
- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - Jackstraw, 3/14/2011, 10:53 pm
- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - Conclue, 3/14/2011, 10:46 pm
- And the radiation is higher - Chris in Tampa, 3/14/2011, 10:39 pm
- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - JAC, 3/14/2011, 10:38 pm
- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - Anung Mwka, 3/14/2011, 10:37 pm
- some one just sent me this - nyjames11955, 3/14/2011, 9:16 pm
- seems a done deal, water released - BobbiStorm, 3/14/2011, 8:51 pm
- Radiation 10K x above normal - JAC, 3/14/2011, 8:50 pm
- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - Chris in Tampa, 3/14/2011, 8:14 pm
- Re: concern over containment vessel being broken - BobbiStorm, 3/14/2011, 8:07 pm
Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.