Re: 16N62W (Erika)
Posted by Target on 9/3/2009, 10:41 pm
| Oh, hmmm, the precipitable water loop does seem to point to a location near Puerto Rico. I find the rgb loop most convincing as it provides the best visual representation of spinning cyclone.    |
76
In this thread:
Yet another freaking new COC??? - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:14 pm
- 16N62W (Erika) - Target, 9/3/2009, 10:28 pm
- pathetic - BobbiStorm, 9/3/2009, 10:46 pm
- Re: pathetic - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:13 pm
- Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:25 pm
- Re: Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:04 am
- Re: Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - Chris in Tampa, 9/3/2009, 11:50 pm
- and to add to what Chris said - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:08 am
- Re: and to add to what Chris said - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:27 am
- Radar shows center over Antigua - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:47 am
- Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:28 am
- Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 1:34 am
- prophetic blog - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:31 am
- Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - Jackstraw, 9/4/2009, 1:49 am
- Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Target, 9/4/2009, 2:04 am
- Re: Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 3:30 am
- quickscat - jimw, 9/4/2009, 7:18 am
- Re: quickscat - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:35 am
- quickscat - jimw, 9/4/2009, 7:18 am
- Re: Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 3:30 am
- Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Target, 9/4/2009, 2:04 am
- Radar shows center over Antigua - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:47 am
- Re: and to add to what Chris said - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:27 am
- and to add to what Chris said - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:08 am
- Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:25 pm
- Re: pathetic - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:13 pm
- pathetic - BobbiStorm, 9/3/2009, 10:46 pm
- No center relocation - yet - DTB_2009, 9/3/2009, 8:53 pm
- I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:16 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:19 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - lbccpt, 9/3/2009, 2:34 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 2:58 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - mdweather, 9/3/2009, 3:56 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - hanna, 9/3/2009, 7:12 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - DTB_2009, 9/3/2009, 3:13 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 4:55 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - mdweather, 9/3/2009, 3:56 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 2:58 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - lbccpt, 9/3/2009, 2:34 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:19 pm
Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.