CaneTalk: Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th

Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th

Posted by Target on 9/4/2009, 2:04 am

Thanks Chris... Excellent radar site: http://www.wunderground.com/radar/radblast.asp?zoommode=zoom&num=6&delay=50&rbscale=0.7043478260869566&scale=1.000&noclutter=0&ID=JUA&type=N0Z&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=99&map.x=419&map.y=313.5&centerx=400&centery=240&lightning=1&smooth=0&showlabels=1&rainsnow=0&MR=1

I think we have two cyclones. One small one with good convection near PR at 17.3N65.5W, and Erika with little convection but broader LLC at 17N62W.

In this thread:

Yet another freaking new COC??? - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:14 pm

16N62W (Erika) - Target, 9/3/2009, 10:28 pm
- Re: 16N62W (Erika) - Target, 9/3/2009, 10:41 pm
  - pathetic - BobbiStorm, 9/3/2009, 10:46 pm
    - Re: pathetic - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:13 pm
      - Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:25 pm
        Re: Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:04 am
        Re: Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - Chris in Tampa, 9/3/2009, 11:50 pm
        and to add to what Chris said - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:08 am
        Re: and to add to what Chris said - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:27 am
        Radar shows center over Antigua - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:47 am
        Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:28 am
        Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 1:34 am
        prophetic blog - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:31 am
        Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - Jackstraw, 9/4/2009, 1:49 am
        Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Target, 9/4/2009, 2:04 am
        Re: Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 3:30 am
        quickscat - jimw, 9/4/2009, 7:18 am
        Re: quickscat - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:35 am
No center relocation - yet - DTB_2009, 9/3/2009, 8:53 pm
I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:16 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:19 pm
  - Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - lbccpt, 9/3/2009, 2:34 pm
    - Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 2:58 pm
      - Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - mdweather, 9/3/2009, 3:56 pm
        Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - hanna, 9/3/2009, 7:12 pm
      - Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - DTB_2009, 9/3/2009, 3:13 pm
        Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 4:55 pm

< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in

Post A Reply

This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.