Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent
Posted by Target on 9/3/2009, 11:25 pm
| Someone at the NHC may have followed the convection rather than the lower level circulation. How many of the global models are skewed? All of them? Can the past center points be reset for the official record now or do we have to wait until the end of the hurricane season?  |
55
In this thread:
Yet another freaking new COC??? - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:14 pm
- 16N62W (Erika) - Target, 9/3/2009, 10:28 pm
- Re: 16N62W (Erika) - Target, 9/3/2009, 10:41 pm
- pathetic - BobbiStorm, 9/3/2009, 10:46 pm
- Re: pathetic - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:13 pm
- Re: Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:04 am
- Re: Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - Chris in Tampa, 9/3/2009, 11:50 pm
- and to add to what Chris said - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:08 am
- Re: and to add to what Chris said - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:27 am
- Radar shows center over Antigua - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:47 am
- Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:28 am
- Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 1:34 am
- prophetic blog - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:31 am
- Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - Jackstraw, 9/4/2009, 1:49 am
- Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Target, 9/4/2009, 2:04 am
- Re: Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 3:30 am
- quickscat - jimw, 9/4/2009, 7:18 am
- Re: quickscat - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:35 am
- quickscat - jimw, 9/4/2009, 7:18 am
- Re: Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 3:30 am
- Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Target, 9/4/2009, 2:04 am
- Radar shows center over Antigua - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:47 am
- Re: and to add to what Chris said - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:27 am
- and to add to what Chris said - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:08 am
- Re: pathetic - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:13 pm
- pathetic - BobbiStorm, 9/3/2009, 10:46 pm
- Re: 16N62W (Erika) - Target, 9/3/2009, 10:41 pm
- No center relocation - yet - DTB_2009, 9/3/2009, 8:53 pm
- I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:16 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:19 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - lbccpt, 9/3/2009, 2:34 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 2:58 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - mdweather, 9/3/2009, 3:56 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - hanna, 9/3/2009, 7:12 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - DTB_2009, 9/3/2009, 3:13 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 4:55 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - mdweather, 9/3/2009, 3:56 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 2:58 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - lbccpt, 9/3/2009, 2:34 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:19 pm
Post A Reply
This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.