New blog post from Jeff Masters and Bob Henson, "Cuts to U.S. weather and climate research could put public safety at risk":
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2025/02/cuts-to-u-s-weather-and-climate-research-could-put-public-safety-at-risk/
First image in the article taken by Bob Henson.
There's just so much happening right now. Everything is seeing cuts, from fighting hunger and disease worldwide, science, national security, FAA, research into diseases, national parks, fire fighting, IRS, and so, so much more.
The U.S. government is being dismantled to take as much money as they can so that they can spend trillions on more tax cuts for the rich, this time permanently, that would probably bankrupt the country if democrats don't eventually stop it at some point down the road.
I blame most national news/cable media for all this in part too (most all of them normalized Trump, including NBC news), but I still watch clips from MSNBC on YouTube. I got rid of cable years ago.
MSNBC on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/msnbc
I watch the clips from these two shows: The Rachel Maddow Show The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell
So much good information from them.
The only good news is that Trump's poll numbers are going down. A clip about that from Rachel Maddow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2CUFX9kUkM
The only longshot is that Republicans in Congress don't get a break from all the phone calls and townhalls about supporting all this. Elections in two to four years are too far away. Maybe with pressure some things will be reversed, but I don't see it. Courts, if they dare, will likely be the only possible fix. Unless he ignore the courts then, which he more than likely might do.
But I do like seeing some of the republicans that voted for him being angry now. If I'm angry, I want them to be angry. Either that, or personally dealing with the consequences of the mess they voted for.
New York Times article from yesterday: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/20/climate/trump-cuts-hud-disaster-recovery.html (Login required, or turn JavaScript off to read it. I include the full article below.)
I had seen this on a clip from MSNBC I watched. I had to go searching for an article about it. Headline making news in a normal administration doesn't even get coverage in this one among most all the news outlets.
Trump Team Plans Deep Cuts at Office That Funds Recovery From Big Disasters Staff at the office, a branch of the U.S. housing department that Congress uses to address the worst catastrophes, would be reduced by 84 percent.
By Christopher Flavelle
Feb. 20, 2025
The Trump administration plans to all but eliminate the office that oversees America's recovery from the largest disasters, raising questions about how the United States will rebuild from hurricanes, wildfires and other calamities made worse by climate change.
The Office of Community Planning and Development, part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, pays to rebuild homes and other recovery efforts after the country's worst disasters, such as Hurricane Helene in North Carolina and Hurricane Milton in Florida.
The administration plans to cut the staff in that office by 84 percent, according to a document obtained by The New York Times. The number of workers would be cut to 150, from 936 when Mr. Trump took office last month.
Those cuts could slow the distribution of recovery money to North Carolina and other recent disasters, depending how quickly they happen.
"HUD is carrying out President Trump's broader efforts to restructure and streamline the federal government to serve the American people at the highest standard," a spokeswoman for the department, Kasey Lovett, said in an initial statement.
In an additional statement, Ms. Lovett wrote: "Disaster recovery efforts are a top priority and will not be impacted. HUD's mission to serve all communities — especially following tragedies — remains unchanged."
The primary responsibility for rebuilding communities after major disasters falls to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which helps state and local governments pay to repair or rebuild damaged roads, bridges, schools, water treatment plants and other public infrastructure. The agency also provides money to help repair damaged homes.
But some disasters are so big that they exceed FEMA's funding, or the damage doesn't fit neatly within FEMA's programs. When that happens, Congress can choose to provide additional help, through a program at HUD called the Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery.
That extra help from Congress can involve far greater sums than what FEMA can provide. In 2006, for example, Congress provided almost $17 billion to rebuild the Gulf Coast after Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. After Hurricane Sandy, Congress gave Housing and Urban Development more than $15 billion to help rebuild the Northeast.
As disasters have grown more frequent and severe, HUD's disaster recovery program has become central to the country's strategy for coping with climate change. During the 1990s, Congress typically gave the program a few hundred million dollars a year. Over the past decade, by contrast, Congress has often provided billions or even tens of billions annually.
HUD's disaster recovery money also comes with fewer strings attached. The money is largely used to rebuild homes that were either uninsured or underinsured, which the Federal Emergency Management Agency does not pay for. It also goes toward rebuilding infrastructure that's not covered by FEMA, like the private roads and bridges that were significantly damaged by Helene in North Carolina.
The money can also be used for job training, to help workers whose employers went out of business after a disaster.
Because state and local officials are often overwhelmed by a disaster, and because the influx of federal funds is large and quick, one of HUD's main jobs is ensuring the money isn't lost to waste, fraud or abuse. That includes tasks like helping state and local governments set up systems to avoid paying contractors twice, according to a former official who worked on the program. It can also mean more complicated tasks like coordinating HUD's grants with other federal disaster programs.
Housing and Urban Development's community planning and development office was already stretched thin, especially as large-scale disasters have become more frequent. On average, the HUD employees who manage disaster grants are each responsible for overseeing about $1 billion in grants, according to an official who worked in the office.
Deep cuts to staffing levels would make it harder for HUD to prevent fraud, waste and abuse, according to two former officials familiar with the program who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation. The cuts are being dictated by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, whose stated goal is to reduce fraud, waste and abuse.
The community planning and development office is responsible for managing other spending programs beyond disaster recovery. Those include paying for infrastructure upgrades like sewers and sidewalks, affordable housing projects and programs like Meals on Wheels.
As long as we never any natural disasters again, we should be just fine!
There are a lot of people in my region that are being impacted by FEMA rules for example. Some are having to rebuild because 50% of their home was damaged. It's a rule there for a reason. Unfortunately here some municipalities at least didn't bother to inspect homes from the inside, just guessing from the outside at most, so some homes shouldn't have to be torn down and some do need to be. So many are in limbo over that. So that's a mess. But I have a feeling that will just be thrown out at some point and they'll just say do whatever you want. I would imagine flood insurance will be out the window eventually. Some things they'll need Congress for. I think they're too busy coming up with their big bill for a giant tax cut for the rich at the moment.
I'm not religious at all, but I'm closer to being religious than any of the people doing all this. I'm on the side of help the poor and those in need. If there was a Jesus, from what I've learned from all the years I was in religious private schools, he'd be that way too. If a republican came across Jesus, and didn't know who he was, they would surely tell him to... well... foul language would be used. Luckily there are a lot of religious people who aren't crazy and evil, but sadly a lot of republicans use religion more as a weapon and there a lot of them.
All this because one guy really, really didn't want to go to prison. (and 77 million people misplaced their common sense) |